Visible & Consequential Difference
It is in this context that we have launched ReligionsMN. We have a number of goals but they are all focused on the increased importance of cultivating a complex and nuanced religious literacy among public leaders in a broad range of fields. By religious literacy, we mean more than a shared vocabulary, but also a facility with speaking fruitfully in public about and across religious difference, not simply as a function of interfaith dialogue but as communities and publics addressing common problems. As noted by the work of Harvard University’s Pluralism Project, religious literacy, along with the ability to make, and articulate, critical decisions on issues that emerge in a multi-religious society are now essential requirements for effective civic, cultural, and religious leadership. With attempts to rescind DACA, efforts to legislate antipathy toward immigrants through travel bans, the rise of white supremacist movements, and civic debate raging over whose histories and values will be honored in the public square or determine the use of natural resources, we need more than ever to find ways to understand one another and bridge our differences in ways that promote understanding and civil discourse.
Minnesotans can rightly claim extraordinary traditions of neighborliness and interfaith activism. Still, religious diversity has presented deep challenges to those shared values and even belied Minnesota nice. St. Cloud has, just recently, erupted with anti-Islamic sentiment and propaganda directed towards the Somali Muslim community, whose difference is marked not only by their religion but also their race. In December of 2009, numerous obscene cartoons depicting, among other things, the Prophet Muhammad naked, defecating, and engaged in sex acts were posted outside the mosque, Somali Cultural Center, and in front of Muslim owned businesses. Only a few months later, a local pastor took out a large add in the St. Cloud Times in which he identified, what he believed was, the profound Muslim threat to America and the need for Christians to bring Jesus to the Muslims, saving them and our country. Every leader in St. Cloud—from civic, political, media, legal, educational, cultural and religious arenas—has had to respond to these issues. Yet for many, knowledge of Muslim and Somali traditions is profoundly limited.
Lack of religious knowledge has presented challenges in other contexts as well. For example, hospitals and health-care professionals have had to rethink their practices and policies when faced with Hmong patients who only consent to medical treatment when provided under the approving presence of their shamans. While Minnesota has been a model for others who have confronted demands for religious and cultural sensitivity when providing care for Hmong families, health-care professionals here require on-going support to develop religious and cultural understanding of the diverse traditions of their patients when trying to care for a whole person.
Particularly at a time when anti-Muslim expression, and anti-immigrant, anti-Semitic, and racist sentiments are on the rise, and rhetoric from extremist circles is entering the mainstream, work on interreligious and civic engagement in a multi-religious society has never been more urgent. Today, Minnesota is multi-cultural, multi-ethnic, and now, truly, multi-religious as never before. There is wide awareness about the impact of immigration on Minnesota, yet policymakers and civic leaders are often not aware of the religious dimensions to this change. For civic leaders, educators, sociologists, political scientists, economists, and city planners, religion is often overlooked as a factor of analysis. We must ask ourselves what does it mean that Somali Muslim, Hmong practitioners of Shamanism, Hindu, Jewish, Tibetan Buddhist, and Ethiopian communities are now embedded in the landscape of Minnesota? In this way, we seek to both listen and respond to diverse and sometimes conflicting perspectives, and to contribute rigorous scholarly resources, and fair and dispassionate knowledge to public discussions, encouraging civil discourse in which Minnesotans can address complicated religious and cultural issues with increased respect and care.